The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) faces legal challenge

Stay informed with these less controversial but just as important news articles. If topics prove contentious they will be moved the debate area.

Moderator: Phara

User avatar
3 hours later...
Posts: 1031
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:23 am

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) faces legal challenge

Postby Corgimom » Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:39 pm

What is the DMCA?

The DMCA was introduced in 1998, designed to address copyright for media such as film, music and photography in the digital age.

Section 1201 of the law makes it illegal to circumvent "access controls" known as digital rights management (DRM) - a provision designed to stop people doing things such as copying films from a DVD and sharing them on the internet.

But it has wider-reaching consequences, restricting people from doing things such as:

modifying a DVD player so that it will play discs bought anywhere in the world, rather than just the local region
deconstructing a medical device's software to look for vulnerabilities to report to the manufacturer

The maximum penalties for violating the law are a $500,000 fine or a five-year prison sentence.
What does the lawsuit say?
Image copyright Thinkstock
Image caption The DMCA is designed to deter copyright thef
Image Image
est 1953

User avatar
Blissfully Oblivious
Posts: 1779
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 7:48 pm
Location: Right Here

Re: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) faces legal challenge

Postby Feydakin » Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:45 pm

At the very least the DMCA needs to be revised on a regular basis to keep up with current technology and the needs of the people and industries that rely on it... The fact that they don't seem to understand the basics of how these things work and many are unwilling to even approach changing anything is worrisome to say the least.
"Searchers after horror haunt strange, far places..." ~ H.P. Lovecraft, "From Beyond"Image
User avatar
I Feel Ya Sista... Not in that way
Posts: 978
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 4:55 pm
Location: NC

Re: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) faces legal challenge

Postby Skywalker » Wed Jul 27, 2016 10:50 pm

There is also this..

Internet Archive Blogs wrote:
The Copyright Office is trying to redefine libraries, but libraries don’t want it — Who is it for?
Posted on July 27, 2016 by Lila Bailey
The Library Copyright Alliance (which represents the American Library Association and the Association of Research Libraries) has said it does not want changes, the Society of American Archivists has said it does not want changes. The Internet Archive does not want changes, DPLA does not want changes… So why is the Copyright Office holding “hush hush” meetings to “answer their last questions” before going to Congress with a proposed rewrite of the section of Copyright law that pertains to libraries?

This recent move, which has its genesis in an outdated set of proposals from 2008, is just another in series of out of touch ideas coming from the Copyright Office. We’ve seen them propose “notice and staydown” filtering of the Internet and disastrous “extended collective licensing” for digitization projects. These and other proposals have lead some to start asking whose Copyright Office this is, anyway. Now the Copyright Office wants to completely overhaul Section 108 of the Copyright Act, the “library exceptions,” in ways that could break the Wayback Machine and repeal fair use for libraries.

We are extremely concerned that Congress could take the Copyright Office’s proposal seriously, and believe that libraries are actually calling for these changes. That’s why we flew to Washington, D.C. to deliver the message to the Copyright Office in person: now is not the time for changes to Section 108. Libraries and technology have been evolving quickly. Good things are beginning to happen as a result. Drafting a law now could make something that is working well more complicated, and could calcify processes that would otherwise continue to evolve to make digitization efforts and web archiving work even better for libraries and content owners alike.

In fact, just proposing this new legislation will likely have the effect of hitting the pause button on libraries. It will lead to uncertainty for the libraries that have already begun to modernize by digitizing their analog collections and learning how to collect and preserve born-digital materials. It could lead libraries who have been considering such projects to “wait and see.”

Perhaps that’s the point. Because the Copyright Office’s proposal doesn’t seem to help libraries, or the public they serve, at all. ... is-it-for/

Return to “In The News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests